news feed     |     advertising
 
Welcome on OneStopStrategy.com
You are not logged in or not registered yet
Click here for more information about an Account
Register | Log in | Passwordmailer
Frontpage   |   Twitter   |   Photos   |   Drivers   |   Teams   |   Tickets   |   Game   |   Standings Formula 1 on Monday 26 September 2016
 
Of bendy floors and McLaren protests
Tuesday 30 Oktober at 16:34 : In the now very hot debate about whether or not McLaren is doing the right thing by appealing the stewards' "cool fuel" decision, as well as the debates about the punishment certain drivers failed to receive over the course of the season for numerous "small" transgressions, most punters in favour of McLaren are now returning to race one of 2007 - Melbourne.

"But look", they say "Ferrari raced with an illegal, felixible floor in Melbourne, and they got away with it!". They will further state that McLaren made their protest in a very sporting way, by seeking "clarification", rather than lodging a protest.

And yes, all of that is true, not to mention the fact that McLaren brought this issue to the attention of the FIA two days prior to the race - on March 16.

It's a pointless argument though.

Why? Because the FIA had, prior to all of this, declared Ferrari's floor legal. In other words, Ferrari had submitted the design to the FIA for scrutiny, as it had to, and been told it's OK to race with that floor.

Once the "clarification" was sought, the rules weren't changed either. All the FIA changed was their method of testing. This meant Ferrari's floor, which had been declared legal by the FIA, was suddenly illegal and they had to change a fundamental part of the design of their car before the next race. The effect was there for all to see at Malyasia, the next race, where McLaren took a 1-2.

So, is it fair to expect that a "clarification" sought two days before the start of a race, on the day of qualifying, can be properly investigated on race weekend? That it should result in an instruction to change the car before qualifying, or the race, starts? An instruction to change a part of a car that is, as far as the team has been told by the powers that be, legal? Is it fair for the team who sought the clarification to say that they will not appeal the result solely "in the interests of the sport"? Is it even plausible to call the result of the race into question at all, following a post-race change in how a regulation is measured? And following all of those questions, is it in the realms of sanity to compare the two situations? Then and now? To say that McLaren were disadvantaged by this episode?

The question of where McLaren obtained the information on which they based the action, of course, also remains.

Edu de Jager
DailyF1News.com


For all the columns by this author, click here
More about Formula 1 you will find on our new Facebook Account!


Previous article Next article
Related articles
20-09 Ferrari must open base in England - Briatore 0
18-09 Ferrari-Dallara collaboration rumours swirl 0
16-09 Lowe hits back at Ferrari switch rumours 0
04-09 Ferrari 'in right hands' after Allison exit - Marchionne 0
03-09 Ferrari racing new engine at Monza 0
 
Useroptions
Search for more articles in the newsarchive
Print this article
Mail a copy of this article
OneStopStrategy.com Headlines
Formula E would welcome Massa switch 0
Ricciardo not sure radical change good for F1 0
Vandoorne denies Button deal means more pressure 0
Lauda to push for 2017 Bahrain test 0
Mercedes had Ferrari-like struggle too - Wolff 0
McLaren plays down Apple buyout rumours 0
Renault engine swap rumours 'false' - Sainz 0
Singapore was best chance for 2016 win - Ricciardo 0
Honda aims to avoid Suzuka engine penalty 0
'Strong' Rosberg can beat Hamilton - Prost 0
Massa 'surprised' by retirement reaction 0
F1 door 'open' for Berger's nephew - Wolff 0
DailyF1News Magazine
Register now for the DailyF1News Magazine and you will receive a copy in your mailbox every Monday after the race. With the latest news and results from out the paddock of Formula 1.
Click here for more information
Dossier: Insight from the Outside
01.12 - No surprises
12.12 - Where to for Heiki?
30.10 - Of bendy floors and McLaren protests
29.10 - Where to for Fernando?
Click here for more articles in this dossier
 
 
16 Most recent photo's:
Banden per rijder Maleisie 16 Jolyon Palmer, Renault, Singapore 2016 sunday Red Bull, Singapore 2016 sunday Sergio Perez, Force India, Singapore 2016 sunday Sergio Perez, Force India, Singapore 2016 sunday Haas F1, Singapore 2016 sunday Daniel Ricciardo, Lewis Hamilton, Singapore 2016 sunday Jenson Button, McLaren, Singapore 2016 sunday
Sebastian Vettel, Ferrari, Singapore 2016 sunday Max Verstappen, Daniel Ricciardo, Singapore 2016 sunday Marcus Ericsson, Carlos Sainz jnr, Sebastian Vettel, Singapore 2016 sunday Daniil Kvyat, Scuderia Toro Rosso, Singapore 2016 sunday Valtteri Bottas, Williams, Singapore 2016 sunday Pascal Wehrlein, Manor, Singapore 2016 sunday Felipe Massa, Williams, Singapore 2016 sunday Carlos Sainz jnr, Red Bull, Singapore 2016 sunday
Copyright ©2016 Onestopstrategy.com Powered by Websitefreelancers.nl About us | Contact | Advertising | Vacancies | Pricacy Statement