news feed     |     advertising
Welcome on
You are not logged in or not registered yet
Click here for more information about an Account
Register | Log in | Passwordmailer
Frontpage   |   Twitter   |   Photos   |   Drivers   |   Teams   |   Tickets   |   Game   |   Standings Formula 1 on Friday 28 Oktober 2016
Of bendy floors and McLaren protests
Tuesday 30 Oktober at 16:34 : In the now very hot debate about whether or not McLaren is doing the right thing by appealing the stewards' "cool fuel" decision, as well as the debates about the punishment certain drivers failed to receive over the course of the season for numerous "small" transgressions, most punters in favour of McLaren are now returning to race one of 2007 - Melbourne.

"But look", they say "Ferrari raced with an illegal, felixible floor in Melbourne, and they got away with it!". They will further state that McLaren made their protest in a very sporting way, by seeking "clarification", rather than lodging a protest.

And yes, all of that is true, not to mention the fact that McLaren brought this issue to the attention of the FIA two days prior to the race - on March 16.

It's a pointless argument though.

Why? Because the FIA had, prior to all of this, declared Ferrari's floor legal. In other words, Ferrari had submitted the design to the FIA for scrutiny, as it had to, and been told it's OK to race with that floor.

Once the "clarification" was sought, the rules weren't changed either. All the FIA changed was their method of testing. This meant Ferrari's floor, which had been declared legal by the FIA, was suddenly illegal and they had to change a fundamental part of the design of their car before the next race. The effect was there for all to see at Malyasia, the next race, where McLaren took a 1-2.

So, is it fair to expect that a "clarification" sought two days before the start of a race, on the day of qualifying, can be properly investigated on race weekend? That it should result in an instruction to change the car before qualifying, or the race, starts? An instruction to change a part of a car that is, as far as the team has been told by the powers that be, legal? Is it fair for the team who sought the clarification to say that they will not appeal the result solely "in the interests of the sport"? Is it even plausible to call the result of the race into question at all, following a post-race change in how a regulation is measured? And following all of those questions, is it in the realms of sanity to compare the two situations? Then and now? To say that McLaren were disadvantaged by this episode?

The question of where McLaren obtained the information on which they based the action, of course, also remains.

Edu de Jager

For all the columns by this author, click here
More about Formula 1 you will find on our new Facebook Account!

Previous article Next article
Related articles
25-10 Italian press says Ferrari misses Alonso 0
24-10 Arrivabene rejects latest Ferrari rumours 0
20-10 Report links Boullier with Ferrari move 0
13-10 Ferrari rejects need for English F1 base 0
12-10 Ferrari has 'climate of terror' in 2016 - Baldisserri 0
Search for more articles in the newsarchive
Print this article
Mail a copy of this article Headlines
Haas keeping driver door open for 2017 0
Palmer linked with Sauber switch 0
Perez waiting for Ferrari switch - Hulkenberg 0
Team predicts 9 second boost in 2017 - report 0
Wolff only wants to make money - Ecclestone 0
Red Bull atmosphere will not sour - Verstappen 0
F1 journalists say Alonso best driver 0
Gasly to be reserve driver in 2017 - Marko 0
Verstappen needs patience to win again - Marko 0
Sauber sabotage claims 'ridiculous' - report 0
'Fighter' Hamilton can still win title - Verstappen 0
'Relaxed' Massa eyeing next seat after F1 0
DailyF1News Magazine
Register now for the DailyF1News Magazine and you will receive a copy in your mailbox every Monday after the race. With the latest news and results from out the paddock of Formula 1.
Click here for more information
Dossier: Insight from the Outside
01.12 - No surprises
12.12 - Where to for Heiki?
30.10 - Of bendy floors and McLaren protests
29.10 - Where to for Fernando?
Click here for more articles in this dossier
16 Most recent photo's:
Lewis Hamilton, Mercedes GP, Austin USA Sunday 2016 Sebastian Vettel, Ferrari, Austin USA Sunday 2016 Sebastian Vettel, Ferrari, Austin USA Sunday 2016 Nico Rosberg, pit stop, Mercedes GP, Austin USA Sunday 2016 Romain Grosjean, Haas F1, Austin USA Sunday 2016 Felipe Nasr, Sauber, Austin USA Sunday 2016 Felipe Massa, Williams, Austin USA Sunday 2016 Lewis Hamilton, Nico Rosberg, Mercedes GP, Austin USA Sunday 2016
Sebastian Vettel, Kimi Raikkonen, Ferrari, Austin USA Sunday 2016 Valtteri Bottas, Williams, Austin USA Sunday 2016 Pascal Wehrlein, Esteban Ocon, Manor, Austin USA Sunday 2016 Felipe Massa, Williams, Austin USA Sunday 2016 Jenson Button, Fernando Alonso, McLaren, Austin USA Sunday 2016 Romain Grosjean, Gene Haas, Haas F1, Austin USA Sunday 2016 Jolyon Palmer, Renault, pit stop, Austin USA Sunday 2016 Daniel Ricciardo, Max Verstappen, Red Bull, Austin USA Sunday 2016
Copyright ©2016 Powered by About us | Contact | Advertising | Vacancies | Pricacy Statement