news feed     |     advertising
 
Welcome on OneStopStrategy.com
You are not logged in or not registered yet
Click here for more information about an Account
Register | Log in | Passwordmailer
Frontpage   |   Twitter   |   Photos   |   Drivers   |   Teams   |   Results   |   Game   |   Standings Formula 1 on Tuesday 23 December 2014
 
Of bendy floors and McLaren protests
Tuesday 30 Oktober at 16:34 : In the now very hot debate about whether or not McLaren is doing the right thing by appealing the stewards' "cool fuel" decision, as well as the debates about the punishment certain drivers failed to receive over the course of the season for numerous "small" transgressions, most punters in favour of McLaren are now returning to race one of 2007 - Melbourne.

"But look", they say "Ferrari raced with an illegal, felixible floor in Melbourne, and they got away with it!". They will further state that McLaren made their protest in a very sporting way, by seeking "clarification", rather than lodging a protest.

And yes, all of that is true, not to mention the fact that McLaren brought this issue to the attention of the FIA two days prior to the race - on March 16.

It's a pointless argument though.

Why? Because the FIA had, prior to all of this, declared Ferrari's floor legal. In other words, Ferrari had submitted the design to the FIA for scrutiny, as it had to, and been told it's OK to race with that floor.

Once the "clarification" was sought, the rules weren't changed either. All the FIA changed was their method of testing. This meant Ferrari's floor, which had been declared legal by the FIA, was suddenly illegal and they had to change a fundamental part of the design of their car before the next race. The effect was there for all to see at Malyasia, the next race, where McLaren took a 1-2.

So, is it fair to expect that a "clarification" sought two days before the start of a race, on the day of qualifying, can be properly investigated on race weekend? That it should result in an instruction to change the car before qualifying, or the race, starts? An instruction to change a part of a car that is, as far as the team has been told by the powers that be, legal? Is it fair for the team who sought the clarification to say that they will not appeal the result solely "in the interests of the sport"? Is it even plausible to call the result of the race into question at all, following a post-race change in how a regulation is measured? And following all of those questions, is it in the realms of sanity to compare the two situations? Then and now? To say that McLaren were disadvantaged by this episode?

The question of where McLaren obtained the information on which they based the action, of course, also remains.

Edu de Jager
DailyF1News.com


For all the columns by this author, click here
More about Formula 1 you will find on our new Facebook Account!


Previous article Next article
Related articles
19-12 Scuderia Ferrari's Christmas (video) 0
18-12 Ferrari 'revolution' stays at full throttle 0
17-12 Ferrari confirms exit for Tombazis, Fry 0
11-12 Ferrari's Pat Fry, Tombazis sent 'on vacation' - reports 0
08-12 Bob Bell to start Ferrari role in March - report 0
 
Useroptions
Search for more articles in the newsarchive
Print this article
Mail a copy of this article
OneStopStrategy.com Headlines
Rosberg overlooked in German sports awards 0
Mercedes rivals can develop engines in-season - reports 0
Verstappen debut 'an insult' - Villeneuve 0
Audi recruit adds more fuel to F1 rumours 0
Engineer says Ferrari shakeup 'impressive' 0
Alonso 'just a spectator' in F1 briefings 0
Ferrari 'vetoed' F1 boss role for Montezemolo 0
Former F1 doctor attacks FIA over hospital visit 0
Alonso was 'tired of Ferrari promises' - Briatore 0
Buemi stays as Red Bull reserve 0
Ricciardo confirms pay-rise for 2015 0
Williams Martini Racing 2014 F1 season review (video) 0
DailyF1News Magazine
Register now for the DailyF1News Magazine and you will receive a copy in your mailbox every Monday after the race. With the latest news and results from out the paddock of Formula 1.
Click here for more information
Dossier: Insight from the Outside
01.12 - No surprises
12.12 - Where to for Heiki?
30.10 - Of bendy floors and McLaren protests
29.10 - Where to for Fernando?
Click here for more articles in this dossier
 
 
16 Most recent photo's:
Will Stevens, Caterham F1, Abu Dhabi test dag 2 2014 Will Stevens, Caterham F1, Abu Dhabi test dag 2 2014 Will Stevens, Caterham F1, Abu Dhabi test dag 2 2014 Mercedes GP, Abu Dhabi test dag 2 2014, Pascal Wehrlein Mercedes GP, Abu Dhabi test dag 2 2014, Pascal Wehrlein Mercedes GP, Abu Dhabi test dag 2 2014, Pascal Wehrlein Mercedes GP, Abu Dhabi test dag 2 2014, Pascal Wehrlein Stoffel Vandoorne, McLaren, Abu Dhabi test dag 2 2014
Stoffel Vandoorne, McLaren, Abu Dhabi test dag 2 2014 Stoffel Vandoorne, McLaren, Abu Dhabi test dag 2 2014 Raffaele Marciello, Ferrari, Abu Dhabi test dag 2 2014 Daniel Ricciardo, Red Bull, Abu Dhabi test dag 2 2014 Daniel Ricciardo, Red Bull, Abu Dhabi test dag 2 2014 Ferrari, Abu Dhabi test dag 2 2014, Raffaele Marciello Ferrari, Abu Dhabi test dag 2 2014, Raffaele Marciello Ferrari, Abu Dhabi test dag 2 2014, Raffaele Marciello
Copyright ©2014 Onestopstrategy.com Powered by Websitefreelancers.nl About us | Contact | Advertising | Vacancies | Pricacy Statement