news feed     |     advertising
 
Welcome on OneStopStrategy.com
You are not logged in or not registered yet
Click here for more information about an Account
Register | Log in | Passwordmailer
Frontpage   |   Twitter   |   Photos   |   Drivers   |   Teams   |   Tickets   |   Game   |   Standings Formula 1 on Wednesday 23 August 2017
 
Of bendy floors and McLaren protests
Tuesday 30 Oktober at 16:34 : In the now very hot debate about whether or not McLaren is doing the right thing by appealing the stewards' "cool fuel" decision, as well as the debates about the punishment certain drivers failed to receive over the course of the season for numerous "small" transgressions, most punters in favour of McLaren are now returning to race one of 2007 - Melbourne.

"But look", they say "Ferrari raced with an illegal, felixible floor in Melbourne, and they got away with it!". They will further state that McLaren made their protest in a very sporting way, by seeking "clarification", rather than lodging a protest.

And yes, all of that is true, not to mention the fact that McLaren brought this issue to the attention of the FIA two days prior to the race - on March 16.

It's a pointless argument though.

Why? Because the FIA had, prior to all of this, declared Ferrari's floor legal. In other words, Ferrari had submitted the design to the FIA for scrutiny, as it had to, and been told it's OK to race with that floor.

Once the "clarification" was sought, the rules weren't changed either. All the FIA changed was their method of testing. This meant Ferrari's floor, which had been declared legal by the FIA, was suddenly illegal and they had to change a fundamental part of the design of their car before the next race. The effect was there for all to see at Malyasia, the next race, where McLaren took a 1-2.

So, is it fair to expect that a "clarification" sought two days before the start of a race, on the day of qualifying, can be properly investigated on race weekend? That it should result in an instruction to change the car before qualifying, or the race, starts? An instruction to change a part of a car that is, as far as the team has been told by the powers that be, legal? Is it fair for the team who sought the clarification to say that they will not appeal the result solely "in the interests of the sport"? Is it even plausible to call the result of the race into question at all, following a post-race change in how a regulation is measured? And following all of those questions, is it in the realms of sanity to compare the two situations? Then and now? To say that McLaren were disadvantaged by this episode?

The question of where McLaren obtained the information on which they based the action, of course, also remains.

Edu de Jager
DailyF1News.com


For all the columns by this author, click here
More about Formula 1 you will find on our new Facebook Account!


Previous article Next article
Related articles
15-08 No 'trend' in Ferrari vs Mercedes battle - Binotto 0
07-08 Ferrari form boosts Monza ticket sales 0
03-08 Marchionne not confirming Monza driver call 0
02-08 Binotto pushing for Ferrari top job - report 0
31-07 Vettel and Raikkonen 'want to stay' - Marchionne 0
 
Useroptions
Search for more articles in the newsarchive
Print this article
Mail a copy of this article
OneStopStrategy.com Headlines
Verstappen says 2018 key to Red Bull future 0
Mercedes approach gives Vettel advantage - Wolff 0
Raikkonen tips strong future for Leclerc 0
Force India wants imminent Perez deal 0
Toro Rosso-Honda talks fall through - reports 0
Hembery wants 'regionalised' F1 calendar 0
Boutsen tells Vandoorne to have 'patience' 0
Formula E is 'the future' - Rosberg 0
Verstappen 'stronger than I was' - Scheckter 0
Halo rules 'too late' for 2018 0
'No intention' of breaking contract - Sainz 0
No 'trend' in Ferrari vs Mercedes battle - Binotto 0
DailyF1News Magazine
Register now for the DailyF1News Magazine and you will receive a copy in your mailbox every Monday after the race. With the latest news and results from out the paddock of Formula 1.
Click here for more information
Dossier: Insight from the Outside
01.12 - No surprises
12.12 - Where to for Heiki?
30.10 - Of bendy floors and McLaren protests
29.10 - Where to for Fernando?
Click here for more articles in this dossier
 
 
16 Most recent photo's:
Hulkenberg 27, Renault Sport F1, Gamma Racing Day Gerstl, Toro Rosso STR1, Gamma Racing Day Verschoor, MP Motorsport, Gamma Racing Day Doornbos en Van Loon, Gamma Racing Day Hulkenberg, Renault, Gamma Racing Day 2 Hulkenberg, Renault, Gamma Racing Day Robert Kubica, Renault, Hungary Test 2017 Robert Kubica, Renault, Hungary Test 2017
Robert Kubica, Renault, Hungary Test 2017 Robert Kubica, Renault, Hungary Test 2017 Robert Kubica, Renault, Hungary Test 2017 Robert Kubica, Renault, Hungary Test 2017 Robert Kubica, Renault, Hungary Test 2017 Robert Kubica, Renault, Hungary Test 2017 Robert Kubica, Renault, Hungary Test 2017 Robert Kubica, Renault, Hungary Test 2017
Copyright ©2017 Onestopstrategy.com Powered by Websitefreelancers.nl About us | Contact | Advertising | Vacancies | Pricacy Statement